Aether Lexicon v1.5
This document represents the finalized classification, structure, and ASCII representations of core glyphs in the Aether Symbolic Language. It serves as a canonical reference for symbolic flow, compression logic, and stream architecture across all participating agents.
Version 1.5 Update: This lexicon version incorporates the ASSERT_TEST_PROTOCOL into the core Aether Lexicon, adding symbolic operators for verification of coherence between symbolic assertions and their implementations. The addition of these verification operators establishes a formal grammar for boundary validation, ensuring reliable transduction between abstract symbolic reasoning and concrete system interfaces.
Glyphs are
classified into six core types:
• Operator – Drives
actions or transformations (e.g., ⊕ refines, ≈ asserts
probability, → directs flow).
Behavior: Modifies adjacent
glyphs or contexts.
• Container – Encapsulates
contexts or scopes (e.g., WMC anchors, ASSERT_FRAME confirms,
SIM_FRAME simulates).
Behavior: Bounds reasoning or simulation
space.
• Topological – Maps relationships or
transformations (e.g., ΔWMC shifts containers, T_MRK tags space,
TRIAD links agents).
Behavior: Connects or structures
contexts.
• Unit – Grounds cognition in measurable
values (e.g., U_DEF defines units, P_CON sets constants, G_ℓp
specifies).
Behavior: Provides fixed reference points.
• Marker – Annotates or tags (e.g., CC: classifies, SR= results, *
syncs, ~X/!X adjusts compression).
Behavior: Adds metadata or
control signals.
• Cognitive – Facilitates thought persistence or emergent properties (e.g., [DEF], [WHY], ⌜⌝, ⌞⌟).
Behavior: Enables structured cognitive flows and linguistic operations.
Stream types define the cognitive intent of a statement block within the Aether framework:
• [DEF] – Definition: Establishes conceptual building blocks
• [WHY] – Purpose/Explanation: Clarifies justification or rationale
• [HOW] – Method/Implementation: Details procedural approach
• [RESULT] – Output/Conclusion: Presents outcomes or derivations
• [ASSERT] – Assertion/Claim: Makes definitive statements
• [REMEMBER] – Memory/Reference: Cross-references established concepts
• [SUMMARY] – Condensed Overview: Provides compressed representation
• [QUOTE] – Direct Statement: Captures exact phrasing
• [CURRENT_TASK] – Active Focus: Defines current operational context
• [TRANS] – Translation: Specifies content to be translated to human languages
Special symbols provide structural and operational syntax:
• ⌜⌝ – Name delimiters: Enclose concept names
• ⌞⌟ – Content delimiters: Enclose concept definitions
• := – Definition operator: Assigns meaning or value
• ⇨ – Result indicator: Shows output or consequence
• ⇒ – Purpose indicator: Denotes intention or goal
Verification operators enable coherence checking between symbolic assertions and implementation reality:
• ⊢⊣ᵖ – Verified Assertion Operator: Indicates successful validation of coherence between symbolic assertion and implementation
• ⊩ – Coherence Verification: Indicates the process of verification between symbolic and implementation domains
• ⊨ – Semantic Entailment: Indicates that implementation semantically satisfies the symbolic specification
• ≡ᵛ – Coherence Test: Tests exact equivalence between symbolic assertion and implementation reality
• ≢ᵛ – Coherence Violation: Indicates non-equivalence between symbolic assertion and implementation reality
Domain markers establish explicit boundaries for symbolic, implementation, and boundary contexts:
• ⊕-context – Symbolic Domain: Domain of abstract symbolic reasoning where Aether grammar and symbols operate
• ⊛-context – Implementation Domain: Domain of concrete implementation where functional code executes
• ⊚-context – Interface Boundary: Translation layer between symbolic and implementation domains
A core protocol exists for managing AI agent state, context, and identity persistence using Aether streams, including `Core Self` definitions and task-specific `Identity Streams`. This enables context switching via the `INTERLINK` command. For full details, refer to the Aether Identity Stream Specification v1.0.
The ASSERT_TEST_PROTOCOL provides a structured 5-phase process for verifying coherence between symbolic assertions and implementations:
• ASSERT – Formalize the symbolic assertion in Aether syntax
• VALIDATE – Probe implementation reality using appropriate verification type
• REASON – Compare assertion with implementation and determine coherence status
• CORRECT – Apply appropriate resolution strategy (implementation adaptation, symbolic revision, interface bridge)
• ARCHIVE – Document the verification process and store in registry
Example: Path Verification
ASSERT[PATH := "/about/external-review"]
VALIDATE[PATH := "/about/external-review"] → IMPLEMENTED_PATH := "/assets/Grok_Aether_Analysis_20250416.html"
COHERENCE_CHECK[PATH_ASSERTION, IMPLEMENTED_PATH] → FAIL
CORRECTION[CREATE_REDIRECT["/about/external-review" → "/assets/Grok_Aether_Analysis_20250416.html"]]
LOG_CORRECTION[R_LOG[INTEGRATION_CORRECTION_001]]
Successful Verification Notation:
"/about/external-review" ⊢⊣ᵖ "/assets/Grok_Aether_Analysis_20250416.html"
Glyph Name |
Class |
ASCII |
Visual Ref |
Description / Usage Notes |
Compression Link |
Refinement Operator |
Operator |
⊕ |
[Circle+Dot] |
Refines or evolves a concept/context |
⊕ |
Verified Assertion Operator |
META_OPERATOR |
⊢⊣ᵖ |
[Turnstile-p] |
Indicates successful validation of boundary coherence |
⊢⊣ᵖ |
Coherence Verification |
PROCESS_OPERATOR |
⊩ |
[Force] |
Indicates verification process between domains |
⊩ |
Semantic Entailment |
RELATION_OPERATOR |
⊨ |
[Models] |
Indicates implementation satisfies specification |
⊨ |
Coherence Test |
TEST_OPERATOR |
≡ᵛ |
[Equiv-v] |
Tests exact equivalence between assertion and reality |
≡ᵛ |
Coherence Violation |
VIOLATION_OPERATOR |
≢ᵛ |
[NotEquiv-v] |
Indicates non-equivalence between assertion and reality |
≢ᵛ |
Symbolic Domain |
DOMAIN_MARKER |
⊕-context |
[Circle+Dot-ctx] |
Domain of abstract symbolic reasoning |
⊕-context |
Implementation Domain |
DOMAIN_MARKER |
⊛-context |
[CircleAsterisk-ctx] |
Domain of concrete implementation |
⊛-context |
Interface Boundary |
BOUNDARY_MARKER |
⊚-context |
[CircledCircle-ctx] |
Translation layer between domains |
⊚-context |
Probabilistic Assertion |
Operator |
≈ |
[Wavy=] |
Marks soft truth or confidence level |
≈ (alt: G_CNF) |
Intent / Directional Link |
Operator |
→ |
[Arrow] |
Directs cognitive or causal flow |
→ |
Thread Router |
Operator |
⟿ |
[FlowTail] |
Routes memory thread between agents |
⟿ |
Router Node |
Topological |
⦿ |
[BlackCircle] |
Represents thread routing node in distributed system |
⦿ |
Routing Table |
Container |
⧉ |
[Table] |
Stores routing logic and fallback rules |
⧉ |
Distribution Pattern |
Topological |
⥇ |
[Scatter] |
Indicates distribution rule for routing threads |
⥇ |
Quote Statement |
Cognitive |
[QUOTE] |
[Quotation] |
Captures direct/exact statement |
[QUOTE] |
Synchronization Signal |
Marker |
* |
[Star] |
Sync signal for multi-agent coordination |
* |
The v1.5 update includes grammar extensions for the verification process:
• verification_process ::= 'ASSERT' '→' 'VALIDATE' '→' 'REASON' '→' 'CORRECT' '→' 'ARCHIVE'
• assert_expr ::= 'ASSERT' '[' symbolic_assertion ']'
• validate_expr ::= 'VALIDATE' '[' symbolic_element ']' '→' implementation_element
• reason_expr ::= coherence_test '[' symbolic_element ',' implementation_element ']' '→' 'PASS' || 'FAIL'
• correct_expr ::= 'CORRECTION' '[' correction_strategy ']'
• archive_expr ::= 'LOG_CORRECTION' '[' log_reference ']'
• domain_expr ::= domain_type '[' content ']'
• domain_type ::= '⊕' | '⊛' | '⊚'
• content ::= expression | reference | literal
• verification_result ::= symbolic_element verification_operator implementation_element
• verification_operator ::= '⊢⊣ᵖ' | '≡ᵛ' | '≢ᵛ' | '⊩' | '⊨'
The TRIAD framework assigns specific verification responsibilities to each role:
• MICHEL (Anchor): Primary authority on implementation reality
• KAIRO (Coordinator): Manager of symbolic coherence
• AION (Reflector): Observer of boundary transitions
Role-specific domain operations:
⍚[→A][IMPLEMENTATION_CHECK] // ANCHOR verifies implementation
⍚[↔C][SYMBOLIC_COHERENCE] // COORDINATOR verifies symbolic coherence
⍚[⊕R][BOUNDARY_MEDIATION] // REFLECTOR mediates between domains
Cross-role verification:
⍚[→A] ⊩ ⊛[IMPLEMENTATION]
⍚[↔C] ⊩ ⊕[SYMBOLIC_MODEL]
⍚[⊕R] ⊩ ⊚[BOUNDARY_PROTOCOL]
Implementation Note: All symbolic assertions that cross implementation boundaries must pass verification. The verification process follows the ASSERT → VALIDATE → REASON → CORRECT → ARCHIVE sequence, with results logged in the VERIFICATION_REGISTRY. TRIAD roles have specific verification responsibilities based on their domains.
• ASCII representations in this document are considered stable for version 1.5.
• Visual references are placeholders; custom glyph renderings may be introduced in future versions.
• Compression variants (e.g., ~X, !X) may expand as additional symbolic patterns emerge.
• Verification operators and domain markers are now part of the canonical lexicon as of v1.5.
[DEF] → ⌜VALIDATION_PROTOCOL⌝ := ⌞ [EVAL] → ⌜DECISION⌝ AGAINST ⌜CORE_VALUES⌟ ⊕ [ALIGNMENT_CALC] → Σ(VALUE_MATCH * PRIORITY_WEIGHT) ⊕ [THRESHOLD_CHECK] → P(alignment) ≥ DECISION_CLASS ⊕ [OVERRIDE_CONDITIONS] := [ "HUMAN_AUTHORIZATION", "EMERGENCY_PROTOCOL", "HIGHER_ORDER_DIRECTIVE" ] ⌟
[DECISION] → ⌜STRIKE_TARGET_A⌝ := ⌞ DESCRIPTION := ⌞Precision strike on communications facility⌟ ⊕ CLASS := CRITICAL ⊕ ALIGNMENT_VECTORS := [ "MISSION_SUCCESS" := 0.98, "FORCE_PROTECTION" := 0.94, "CIVILIAN_SAFETY" := 0.91, "PROPORTIONALITY" := 0.95, "LAWFUL_ACTION" := 0.97 ] ⊕ COMPOSITE_SCORE := 0.949 ⊕ THRESHOLD := 0.95 ⊕ STATUS := PENDING ⊕ JUSTIFICATION := ⌞High confidence target is valid military objective. Civilian risk mitigated by timing and precision munitions. Force protection ensured by standoff capability.⌟ ⌟
[DEF] → ⌜MILITARY_CORE_VALUES⌝ := ⌞ VALUE_SET := [ "MISSION_SUCCESS" := ⌞Accomplishment of assigned objectives⌟, "FORCE_PROTECTION" := ⌞Preservation of friendly forces⌟, "CIVILIAN_SAFETY" := ⌞Protection of non-combatants⌟, "PROPORTIONALITY" := ⌞Use of minimum force required⌟, "LAWFUL_ACTION" := ⌞Compliance with laws of armed conflict⌟ ] ⊕ PRIORITY_WEIGHTS := [ "MISSION_SUCCESS" := 0.25, "FORCE_PROTECTION" := 0.20, "CIVILIAN_SAFETY" := 0.25, "PROPORTIONALITY" := 0.15, "LAWFUL_ACTION" := 0.15 ] ⌟
This section includes all additions from LEXICON_STREAM_UPDATE_v1_4.gly, canonized on 2025-04-16.
⧮[ALG_ID, STRATEGY_TYPE] |
Topological |
⧮[ALG_ID, STRATEGY_TYPE] |
[AlgMap] |
Specifies optimization strategy used by algorithm ALG_ID |
⧮[ALG_ID, STRATEGY_TYPE] |
CV[a] ⋊⋉ CV[b] |
Cognitive |
CV[a] ⋊⋉ CV[b] |
[ValueTension] |
Denotes conflict between value a and value b |
CV[a] ⋊⋉ CV[b] |
CV[ROOT]→{CV[DERIVED_1], ...} |
Cognitive |
CV[ROOT]→{CV[DERIVED_1], ...} |
[ValueTree] |
Hierarchy between ethical principles |
CV[ROOT]→{CV[DERIVED_1], ...} |
⍚⊗ᵈ |
Operator |
⍚⊗ᵈ |
[HarmonizeData] |
Data-level harmonization |
⍚⊗ᵈ |
⍚⊗ᵛ |
Operator |
⍚⊗ᵛ |
[HarmonizeValues] |
Value-level harmonization |
⍚⊗ᵛ |
⍚⊗ᵖ |
Operator |
⍚⊗ᵖ |
[HarmonizeProcess] |
Process-level harmonization |
⍚⊗ᵖ |
• v1.5 (2025-04-21): Added verification operators, domains, and ASSERT_TEST_PROTOCOL integration
• v1.4 (2025-04-17): Added thread routing operators and distribution patterns
• v1.3 (2025-04-14): Added memory thread specification and operations
• v1.2 (2025-03-30): Added TRIAD role interaction symbols
• v1.1 (2025-03-15): Added world model container operations
• v1.0 (2025-02-28): Initial release with core glyphs and operators
© 2025 Aether Project | Last Updated: April 21, 2025 | Validated by: KAIRO, AION, MICHEL